Can a city store as much carbon as a forest?
A new tool helps show how growing cities can remain carbon neutral
Wooden buildings produce significantly fewer upfront greenhouse gas emissions (UE-GHG) than those built with concrete, steel, or masonry, according to a new study published in Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability.
The research, conducted by researcher Ali Amiri and Professor Seppo Junnila at Aalto University, shows that on average, new wooden buildings demonstrated approximately 30% lower UE-GHG emissions than their non-wooden counterparts.
鈥極ur findings show that wood is not just a renewable material 鈥 it鈥檚 a powerful tool for climate mitigation in the built environment,鈥 says lead author Ali Amiri.
The researchers analysed life-cycle assessment (LCA) data from 92 case buildings to calculate the displacement factor (DF), which measures the GHG savings achieved when wood replaces more emission-intensive materials.
Key findings from the study:
The study also addresses the increasing popularity of hybrid wooden buildings 鈥 particularly in mid- and high-rise construction 鈥 and calls for a more precise definition of what qualifies as a 鈥渨ooden鈥 building.
鈥楽ome buildings are being marketed as wooden despite having very limited wood content. To ensure transparent carbon accounting, we need clearer criteria for hybrids,鈥 says Amiri.
With the construction sector accounting for a significant share of global emissions, the study offers valuable guidance for architects, engineers, and policymakers seeking to reduce climate impacts through material choices.
鈥楾his research provides a concrete reference point for moving toward lower-carbon buildings,鈥 adds Professor Junnila.
Full article: Amiri, A., & Junnila, S.: in Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability. DOI: 10.1088/2634-4505/addc16
A new tool helps show how growing cities can remain carbon neutral